机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学第一附属医院神经内科,合肥230022
出 处:《中华医学杂志》2012年第5期307-311,共5页National Medical Journal of China
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展“973”计划项目(2007CB512306);安徽省教育厅自然科学基金重点项目(KJ2011A170);安徽省自然科学基金项目(090413121)
摘 要:目的 探讨皮质下缺血性抑郁(SID)患者的血管危险因素与认知损害.方法 选择35例SID患者(SID组)、37例皮质下缺血性血管病不伴抑郁患者(SIVD组)、40名正常对照(NC组)为研究对象.SID组和SIVD组来自2010年10月至2011年9月安徽医科大学第一附属医院神经内科就诊患者,NC组来自同期健康体检老年人.使用Framingham评分对血管危险因素进行评定;采用老年抑郁量表(GDS)、汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)(17项)、简易智能精神状态检查量表(MMSE)、蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)、剑桥老年认知量表中文版(CAMCOG-C)、画钟试验(CDT)等对抑郁症状和认知功能进行评定.结果 SID组[(12.3±4.7)分]和SIVD组[(13.5±3.4)分]的Framingham评分均显著高于NC组[(8.6±1.8)分,F=20.850,P=0.000].SID组[(26.7±2.5)分、(20.0±4.0)分、(5.2±2.7)分]和SIVD组[(26.8±1.9)分、(20.7±3.0)分、(6.1±2.1)分]MMSE、MoCA、CDT评分均显著低于NC组[(28.3±1.8)分、(23.1±3.4)分、(8.0±1.8)分,均P<0.05];SID组[(82.7±9.0)分]和SIVD组[(86.2±6.9)分]的CAMCOG-C量表评分均显著低于NC组[(92.3±6.2)分,均P<0.05],SID组的CAMCOG-C量表评分显著低于SIVD组(P<0.05).从CAMCOG-C子项来看,SID组[(9.0±1.4)分、(24.7±4.0)分、(19.5±3.4)分]和SIVD组[(9.4±0.9)分、(25.5±2.1)分、(20.3±2.3)分]的定向、语言、记忆评分均显著低于NC组[(9.9±0.4)分、(27.4±1.9)分、(22.1±2.4)分,均P <0.05];SID组[(9.4±1.9)分]执行评分低于NC组[(10.4±1.5)分,P<0.05],思维、知觉评分[(5.4±1.7)分、(6.3±1.4)分]低于SIVD组[(6.2±1.3)分、(7.0±1.4)分]和NC组[(6.6±1.3)分、(7.2±1.4)分,均P<0.05].SID组的Framingham评分与各项抑郁及认知评分无显著相关,但GDS和HAMD评分均与MMSE、MoCA、CAMCOG-C、CDT评分呈显著性负相关(均P <0.05).结�Objective To explore the vascular risk factors and neuropsychological proffles of patientswith magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined subcortical ischemic depression (SID).Methods Thirty-five SID patients,37 patients with subcortical ischemic vascular disease without depression (SIVD) and 40 normal controls (NC) participated in this case-control study.The SID and SIVD groups were recruited from the Department of Neurology,First Affiliated Hospital,Anhui Medical University between October 2010 and September 2011.And the NC group came from Medical Center,First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University over the same period.The vascular risk factors of all participants were assessed by the Framingham scale.Depression symptoms were assessed by the geriatric depression scale (GDS) and Hamilton depression scale (HAMD) while cognitive functions by the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) and Montreal cognitive clock drawing task (CDT).Results Both the SID ( 12.3 ± 4.7 ) and SIVD (13.5 ± 3.4) groups showed significantly higher Framingham scores than the NC group (8.6 ± 1.8 )(F =20.850,P =0.000).Compared with the NC group (28.3 ± 1.8 ; 23.1 ± 3.4 ; 8.0 ± 1.8 ),the MMSE,MoCA and CDT scores were significantly lower in the SID (26.7 ± 2.5 ; 20.0 ± 4.0; 2.0 ± 2.7 )and SIVD (26.8 ± 1.9 ; 20.7 ± 3.0; 6.1 ± 2.1 ) groups ( P 〈 0.05 ).There were significantly lower CAMCOG-C scores in the SID ( 82.7 ± 9.0) and SIVD (86.2 ± 6.9) groups versus the NC group (92.3 ±6.2) (P 〈 0.05 ) and similarly in the SID group versus the SIVD group ( P 〈 0.05 ).Among the subtests of CAMCOG-C,the orientation,language and memory scores in both SID (9.0 ± 1.4; 24.7 ± 4.0; 19.5 ±3.4) and SIVD (9.4 ± 0.9 ; 25.5 ± 2.1 ; 20.3 ± 2.3 ) groups were significantly lower than those in the NC group (9.9 ± 0.4 ; 27.4 ± 1.9 ; 22.1 ± 2.4) ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; the praxis scores in the SID group (9.4 ± 1.9)were significantly lower th
分 类 号:R749.1[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...