一次完成与分次完成龈下刮治的短期疗效观察  

Observation of Short-term Clinical Effect between FM-SRP and Q-SRP

作　　者：王彬娉[1] 吴卓骏[1] 吴卉[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南大学湘雅医学院附属海口医院口腔中心.海南省口腔医学中心,海南海口570208

出　　处：《口腔医学研究》2012年第2期160-161,共2页Journal of Oral Science Research

摘　　要：目的:比较一次完成和分次完成龈下刮治治疗牙周炎的短期临床疗效。方法:30例中度牙周炎患者,进行洁治和口腔卫生指导后随机分为两组,实验组为一次性完成龈下刮治,洗必泰含漱;对照组为传统的分4次完成龈下刮治,每次间隔1周。记录各组刮治前,治疗后6周的改良龈沟出血指数(SBI)、探诊深度(PD)、附着丧失(AL)等相关指标。结果:一次性和分次完成龈下刮治均使SBI、PD、AL等指标明显改善,但实验组与对照组相比较SBI、PD、AL等指标明无统计学差异。结论:一次和分次完成龈下刮治治疗牙周炎疗效肯定,一次性龈下刮治较传统的分次法治疗周期短,复诊次数少,提高患者的依从性,值得在临床上推广。Objective： To compare the short-term clinical effect of full-mouth subgingival scaling and root planning （FM-SRP） with quadrant scaling and root planning （Q-SRP）. Methods： 30 patients with moderate periodontitis patients, were randomly divided into two groups after the scaling and oral hygiene instruction. The experimental group conducted FM-SRP using chlorhexidine rinse. The control group completed the traditional subgingival scaling by 4 times, each separated by 1 week. The related indicators of improved sulcus bleeding index （SBI）, probing depth （PD）, attachment loss （AL） in each group before and 6 weeks after scaling were recorded. Results： The indicators of SBI, PD, AL improved significantly after FM-SRP and Q-SRP, but there were no statistical difference of these indicators between the experimental group and the control group. Conclusion： The clinical effect of FM-SRP and Q-SRP were sure. However, FM-SRP needs shorter cycle times and fewer referral than QSRP, improves the compliance of patients, and should be widly used in clinical practice.

关 键 词：一次龈下刮治 分次龈下刮治 短期临床疗效 

分 类 号：R781.42[医药卫生—口腔医学]