临床医学实践教学质量评价分析  

Analysis on Practical Teaching Evaluation of Clinical Medicine

作　　者：殷小寒[1] 罗志勇[1] 尹竹萍[1] 杨维岗[1] 

机构地区：[1]昆明医学院第一附属医院临床教学管理部,云南昆明650031

出　　处：《昆明医学院学报》2012年第1期146-149,共4页Journal of Kunming Medical College

基　　金：云南省教育厅科学研究基金资助项目(2010C112);云南省教育科学规划课题基金资助项目(GY100060);昆明医学院2010年校极重点课题

摘　　要：目的分析学生、同行专家对实践课授课教师的评价情况,为改进教学方法、提高教学质量提供依据.方法对学生、同行专家对实践课授课教师的评价问卷进行统计分析.结果学生、同行专家评价的分值分布有差异,学生评价平均分为93.05,同行专家评价平均分为88.86;将学生和同行专家评价得分分别按优秀比例和平均分排序,排在前三的均是与教学态度相关的内容,排在最后的是临床思维能力培养相关的条目.结论学生、同行专家对实践课任课教师的评价总体较好,同行专家评价相对于学生评价分值较集中,授课教师教学态度良好,需加强学生临床思维能力的培养.Objective Through analyzing the interns＇ evaluation and peer experts＇ evaluation on teachers who giving practical classes, to provide basis for adjusting teaching methods and improve teaching quality. Method The evaluation of interns and peer experts on the teachers of practical teaching was analyzed. Results There was a difference between the scores of interns＇evaluation and peer experts＇evaluation, the average score of interns＇ evaluation was 93.05, the average score of peer experts＇ evaluation was 88.86. After ordering the scores of the two kinds of evaluations on the basis of the excellent proportion and the average score, the items about teaching attitude were top three, and the last item was on the clinical thinking ability. Conclusions The evaluation of interns and peer experts on the teachers of practical teaching is good overall, and the scores of peer experts＇ evaluation is more concentrated than the ones of interns＇evaluation, and teachers＇attitude is good, but the clinical thinking ability needs to be strengthened.

关 键 词：临床医学 实践教学 质量评价 

分 类 号：G642.1[文化科学—高等教育学]