苏轼与王安石在《尚书》诠释上的分歧——以他们的哲学思想为视角  

The Differences between Sushi and Wang Anshi On the Interpretation of Shangshu——In Their Philosophy as he Angle of View

作　　者：胡金旺[1] 

机构地区：[1]宜宾学院马克思主义学院,四川宜宾644000

出　　处：《兰州学刊》2012年第2期5-9,共5页

基　　金：2010年度四川省教育厅社会科学科研基地项目"苏轼与王安石哲学思想比较研究"。(项目编号:10ZX007)

摘　　要：在对《尚书》的诠释中,苏轼从应物合乎情理性所要遵循的标.准情本论出发,用从众的观点批判了王安石从智性出发而以为精英分子可以违众自用的思想。王安石的《尚书新义》过分渲染了刑罚的作用,而苏轼认为治国决不可以过度依赖刑罚甚至重刑,因而对《尚书新义》中有关这些方面的诠释提出了严厉的批判。这种批判是以其哲学思想为基础的,其中的分歧是二人的哲学思想在经典诠释中的必然反映。Sushi conformed with Qingben view which is the standard of the way one conducts oneself in relation to others. By his subject to public, Sushi criticized Wang Anshiwho thought elite molecules could violate the public because of his intelligence. Wang Anshi exaggerated the penalty function on the interpretation of Shangshu. While Sushi considered governing should not depend on punishment so far as to heavy penalty. So he. sternly criticized new commentaries on Shangshu, whose basis is his philosophy thought. Their differences is an inevitable result of their philosophy in the interpretation of the classics.

关 键 词：苏轼 王安石 《尚书》 情本论 智性 

分 类 号：B2[哲学宗教—中国哲学]