检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙晓东[1]
出 处:《河南大学学报(社会科学版)》2012年第2期49-55,共7页Journal of Henan University(Social Sciences)
摘 要:法律因果关系研究范式的确立是解开法律因果关系迷思的重要方法,同时也是通过典型的法律因果关系理论的比较寻找近似性的过程。通过对大陆法系国家、英美法系国家以及我国的典型法律因果关系理论所关注的主要问题的分析,可以将法律因果关系的整体研究范式确立为由"法律因果关系的本体分析、法律因果关系的性质分析、法律因果关系的功能分析和法律因果关系的认定标准分析"四个有机联系的、不可或缺的因素构成的问题系统;可以将"法律因果关系的本体分析范式"、"法律因果关系的性质分析范式"、"法律因果关系的功能分析范式"和"法律因果关系认定标准的分析范式"确立为法律因果关系的个别研究范式。The establishment of research paradigm of causation in law is an important method to solve the difficult causation problem and a process of finding the resemblance by comparing typical theories of causation in law.By the analysis of main problems in the typical theories of Anglo-American law system,civil law system and our country,it can be believed that the whole research paradigm of causation in law is the problem assembly of analysis on phenomenon of causation in law,analysis on character of causation in law,analysis on function of causation in law and analysis on judging standard of causation in law.It can also be believed that the paradigm of phenomenon of causation in law,the paradigm of character of causation in law,the paradigm of function of causation in law and the paradigm of judging standard of causation in law are individual research paradigm of causation in law.
分 类 号:D911.01[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117