检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许建功[1,2] 蔡瑞君[1] 王禹冰[1] 王武军[1]
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学南方医院胸心外科,广东省广州市510515 [2]新乡医学院三附院胸心外科
出 处:《中国全科医学》2012年第6期631-634,共4页Chinese General Practice
摘 要:目的评估胸腔镜联合腹腔镜食管癌根治术不同阶段的手术效果,探讨开展胸腔镜联合腹腔镜食管癌根治术的学习曲线。方法回顾性分析2009年4月—2011年1月由同一组医师完成的50例胸腔镜联合腹腔镜食管癌根治术。按手术先后次序分5组(A~E组),每组10例;比较各组手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数目、手术并发症及术后住院时间,分析不同阶段的手术效果。结果 5组患者在年龄、性别、浸润深度、肿瘤直径、清扫淋巴结数目和手术并发症等方面差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。手术时间A组(424±68)min、B组(348±70)min、C组(275±63)min、D组(279±64)min、E组(245±51)min,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术中出血量和术后住院时间5组间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论胸腔镜联合腹腔镜食管癌根治术的学习曲线大约为20例。Objective To evaluate the surgical outcomes and to explore the learning curve of combined laparocopic and thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma. Methods 50 patients received combined laparocopic and thoraco- scopic esophagectomy performed by the same surgical team were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 5 groups (from A to E) according to surgery date. The operation time, blood loss, numbers of lymph nodes harvested, operative compli- cations, length of specimen, and hospital stay were compared between the 5 groups. Results There were no significant differ- ences between the 5 groups with respect to age, gender, blood loss, number of lymph nodes harvested and length of specimen (P〉0.05) . The operating time in group A , B, C, DandEwere (424±68) min, (348±70) min, (275±63) min, (279± 64 ) min and ( 245 ± 51 ) min respectively. The difference was statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ) . Statistically significant differenees were also found in blood loss and hospital stay between the 5 groups ( P 〈 0.05 ) . Conclusion The learning curve of combined laparocopie and thoraeoseopic esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma performed is approximately 20 cases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3