检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁宏[1] 徐寅[1] 何振仿[1] 钱兴平[2] 徐希平[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学卫生管理学院,合肥230032 [2]安徽医科大学生物医学研究所
出 处:《中华医院管理杂志》2012年第3期194-197,共4页Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration
基 金:安徽省高校省级自然科学研究项目(KJ2009A58)
摘 要:目的测量社区卫生服务人员工作满意度水平,为相关政策设计及效果评价提供决策依据。方法在安徽省12个城市,随机抽取社区卫生服务中心57个、服务站54个为调查现场,被抽取的调查现场全部在岗人员均作为调查对象。调查人员现场发放调查问卷,由被调查者匿名自行填写。结果被调查对象总体满意度平均得分110.84±18.18分;薪酬、福利及晋升等3个评价维度满意度平均得分水平较低,分别为10.05±2.99分、10.35±3.17分和10.85±3.00分;同事关系、工作性质及领导等3个评价维度满意度平均得分水平较高,分别为14.78±2.11分、14.60±2.69分和13.90±3.DO分;logistic回归分析发现工作年数及职称是工作总体满意度的影响因素。结论社区卫生服务人员工作总体满意度水平不高;建立合理的薪酬、福利机制和可预期的职业晋升环境是促进社区卫生服务人员工作满意度的可行选择。Objective Measuring job satisfaction level of community health workers, providing on the evidences for the design of the relevant policy and the evaluation of job effect. Methods 57 Community Health Service centers and 54 stations were randomly selected in 12 cities in Anhui province, and all staff on the job were investigated. The questionnaires were delivered to the working staff and anonymously filled in by them. Results The total job satisfaction average score of the staff is 110. 84± 18.18. The average score of pay(10.05±2.99) ,welfare(10. 35±3.17)and promotion(10. 85±3. 00)are rather low. The average score of coworkers(14. 78±2.11) ,nature of work(14. 60±2.69)and supervision (13.90±3.00)are quite high~ Logistic regression analysis shows the staff's duration and title are the main factors affecting their overall job satisfaction. Conclusion The overall job satisfaction level of community health workers is not high. Establishing the reasonable system of pay, welfare mechanism and the predictable promotion space are feasible choices to promote job satisfaction of community health workers
分 类 号:R197.61[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44