检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江省台州市第一人民医院妇产科,浙江台州318020
出 处:《中国现代医生》2012年第7期146-148,共3页China Modern Doctor
摘 要:目的探讨经阴道子宫肌瘤剔除术与腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术的临床效果。方法回顾分析经阴道子宫肌瘤剔除术85例和同期行腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术96例的术中、术后及随访情况。结果两组术后胃肠功能恢复时间无统计学差异,经阴道组手术时间、术中出血量及医疗费用均少于腹腔镜组(P<0.05),但术后病率高于腹腔镜组(P<0.05)。结论经阴道及腹腔镜下子宫肌瘤剔除术两种微创术式各有优势。Objective To compare the efficacy of transvaginal and laparoscopic myometomy. Methods The clinical data of 85 cases of transvaginal myomectomy and 96 cases of laparoscopic myomectomy were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Results No significant difference was detected in the recovry time of gastroitestinal function, transvaginal group showed singnificantly shorter operation time ,less blood loss and less hospital cost, whereas, puerperal morbidity was highter. Conclusion Both of transvaginal myomectomy and laparoscopic myomectomy have different advantages.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3