检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林文彬
出 处:《当代医学》2012年第8期101-103,共3页Contemporary Medicine
摘 要:目的系统评价经尿道钬激光切除术(HoLRBT)与经尿道膀胱肿瘤电切术(TURBT)治疗膀胱癌的有效性与安全性,为膀胱癌治疗方法的选择提供临床证据。方法对在维普医药信息资源系统V6.32,中国期刊全文数据库等信息源筛选到的文献进行质量评价,并采用Review Manager4.2软件作Meta分析。结果 Meta分析显示:钬激光切除术术中出血少,术后膀胧冲洗例数少,导尿管留置时间短;术后并发症风险小,原位癌复发率低(Z=2.11,P=0.04)。结论钬激光膀胱肿瘤切除术(HoLRBT)是膀胱癌临床治疗的可靠的微创术式。Objective Systematic reviews the effectiveness and security of HoLRBT and TURBT treatment for bladder Cancer, and provide clinical evidence for Bladder cancer treatment options. Methods To investigate and evaluate the relevant documents which are researched in Cqvip medical information resource system, China Journal Full-text Database, etc, and then making Meta analysis by Review Manager4.2. Results The meta-analyses showed: The TURBT were significant differences in HoLRBT for less bleeding volume, shorter mean bladder irrigating time shorter time of indwelling urethral catheter, fewer events of bladder perforation and lower postoperative recurrence rate(Z=2.11 ,P=-0.04). Conclusion The HoLRBT is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment for bladder cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3