检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:范长根[1] 李忠伟[1] 韩亚骞[1] 朱苏雨[1] 陈艳平[1] 吴湘玮[1]
机构地区:[1]湖南省肿瘤医院头颈肿瘤放疗科,长沙410013
出 处:《中国肿瘤临床与康复》2011年第6期526-528,共3页Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
摘 要:目的比较鼻咽癌茎突后间隙侵犯调强放疗与常规放疗对预后的影响。方法将78例鼻咽癌患者分为常规放疗组40例和调强适形放疗组38例,常规放疗采用面颈联合野,两侧成角耳前野,耳后野,总剂量DT 70~74 Gy,调强放疗采用7个野照射,大体肿瘤GTV 69~73 Gy,对3年局控率﹑生存率﹑无远处转移生存率进行分析评价。结果所有患者随访均达到3年,常规放疗组3年局控率、生存率﹑无远处转移生存率分别为57.5%(23/40)、60.0%(24/40)、55.0%(22/40),调强放疗组3年局控率﹑生存率﹑无远处转移生存率81.6%(31/38)、78.9%(30/38)、68.4%(26/38),两者局控率比较,差异有统计学意义(P=0.0213)。结论调强适形放疗能够提高鼻咽癌茎突后间隙侵犯患者的局控率,改善生存率,远处转移是治疗失败的主要原因。Objective To compare the treatment effects between IMRT and conventional radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with post-styloid space involvement. Methods 78 cases of NPC with post-styloid space involvement were treated with conventional radiotherapy (40 cases ) and IMRT (38 cases). Conventional radiotherapy were divided into two phases. The first 36-38 Gy were delivered by the opposed facial-neck fields, and the remaining 34-36 Gy were delivered through 5-10 degree posterior tilted facial fields or an add-on parapharyngeal space field boost of lO-15Gy after opposed facial fields were implemented. For IMRT cases, the post-styloid space was delineated as parts of gross tumor volume and prescribed to 70-74 Gy. Results The 3 year local control, overal survival and metastasis free survival were 57.5% (23/40), 60.0% (24/40)and 55.0% (22/40) for conventional radiotherapy, and 81.6% (31/ 38), 78.9% (30/38)and 68.4% (26/38) for IMRT respectively. The local control between two groups was stastical significant ( P =0. 0213). Conclusion IMRT is superior to conventional radiotherapy in local con- trol for NPC with post-styloid space involvement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38