刑事诉讼中的权力制约与监督  

Checking and Supervision of the Powers in Criminal Procedure

作　　者：周标龙[1] 

机构地区：[1]衡阳师范学院,湖南衡阳421008

出　　处：《行政与法》2012年第2期104-107,共4页Administration and Law

基　　金：2011年度湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目"刑事诉讼权力制约机制研究"的阶段性成果;项目编号:11YBA036

摘　　要：我国刑事诉讼法构建了制约和监督两种权力监控机制以保障权力的合法行使。权力制约在限制侦查权、起诉权和审判权方面发挥了重要作用,但检察监督的效果并不理想。本文认为,在刑事诉讼中强化检察监督不仅会形成不合理的审判结构,而且不符合警检关系的发展趋势,相比之下制约则更具有优势。因此,我国刑事诉讼权力监控理论需要转型,应从监督论走向制约论。There are two ways to confine powers in Criminal Procedure of China：the checking mechanism and the supervision mechanism.The checking mechanism plays positive role in controlling the powers in Criminal Procedure while the supervision mechanism can＇t act well.h will form an irrational trial composition and can＇t conform to the trend of the development of the relationship between the police and the procurator to strengthen the adjudication supervision.The checking mechanism is more important and more effective than the supervision mechanism.It＇s necessary to change the theory of power control from the theory of supervision to the theory of checking in Criminal Procedure of China.

关 键 词：刑事诉讼 制约 监督 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]