检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨建兵[1] 熊为民[1] 屠秀菊[1] 魏武康[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江省余姚市人民医院麻醉科,浙江余姚315400
出 处:《中国现代医生》2012年第8期97-98,共2页China Modern Doctor
摘 要:目的观察比较丙泊酚TCI和丙泊酚复合瑞芬太尼TCI两种麻醉方法用于临床无痛胃镜下胃息肉切除术的可行性,探讨更为安全有效的麻醉用药方法。方法将150例无痛胃镜下胃息肉切除术患者随机分为观察组和对照组各75例,观察组采用静脉丙泊酚复合瑞芬太尼TCI方法实施麻醉,对照组采用静脉丙泊酚TCI方法实施麻醉。结果观察组的镇痛效果明显好于对照组,诱导时间明显短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论瑞芬太尼联用丙泊酚TCI麻醉比单纯丙泊酚TCI麻醉的诱导更快,镇痛镇静效果更好。Objective To observe the anesthesia effect of propofol and propofol combined with remifentanil (TCI) two anes- thesia methods used in clinical painless gastroscopy in gastric polyp resection, to explore a more safe and effective anes- thesia method. Methods All of 150 cases of painless gastroscopy stomach polypus resection were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group with 75 cases in each group. The observation group intravenous propofol combined with remifentanil TCI method, the control group used intravenous propofol TCI method. Results Observation on the anal- gesic effect was better than that of the control group. Conclusion Remifentanil combined with propofol than propofol in- duced faster, analgesic and sedation effect is better.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222