从拟声词看语言符号任意性和象似性的关系  

作　　者：李林林[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南大学

出　　处：《英语广场（学术研究）》2012年第1期53-55,共3页English Square

摘　　要：以索绪尔为代表的语言学家认为语言符号是任意性的,但是韩礼德等语言学家认为语言符号不具有任意性,相反具有象似性。语言符号的任意性和象似性不是对立的关系,而是一个连续体上的两个点,中间还有一个"约定俗成"的概念,用以完成两者之间的过渡。本文讨论了语言符号音义联系的任意性和必然性的关系,结合相应语言事实对拟声词的音义联系及其本质进行分析,提出拟声词音义联系可证性具有本质的局限,据此探讨了语言符号任意性和象似性的关系,指出二者对立统一并共同对语言符号产生作用。The arbitrariness and iconicity of linguistic signs has been a controversial topic. Some linguists represented by Saussure insist that linguistic signs are arbitrary., while others represented by Holliday consider that linguistic signs are not arbitrary but iconic. Based on the analysis of the two opinions, the article proposes that the Arbitrariness and Iconicity of Linguistic Signs are not contradictory, but are two points on a continuum combined by the concept of popular usage.

关 键 词：任意性 象似性 拟声词 音义联系 

分 类 号：H0-0[语言文字—语言学]