《外科证治全生集》与《洞天奥旨》学术思想的比较研究  

Comparative Research on the Academic Ideology of Wai Ke Zheng Zhi Quan Sheng Jiand Dong Tian Ao Zhi

作　　者：和中浚[1] 周兴兰[1] 

机构地区：[1]成都中医药大学,四川成都610075

出　　处：《中华中医药学刊》2012年第3期459-461,共3页Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine

基　　金：教育部人文社科基金资助项目(09YJA870004)

摘　　要：通过对《外科证治全生集》与《洞天奥旨》的比较研究,发现二者在重视阴阳辨证治疗、力主内治,反对轻用外治,以及温药治疗阴证等方面有着相同的学术主张,二者存在学术渊源关系。《外科证治全生集》主要在阴疽的治疗上更具优势,《洞天奥旨》相关论述内容更早且更为丰富,见解较为合理。因此,就通常所论的外科全生派及力主内治的外科学派来说,不能忽视《洞天奥旨》的学术贡献,应该从外科学术流派的角度给予它更高的学术地位。After comparative study of Wai Ke Zheng Zhi Quart Sheng Ji and Dong Tian Ao Zhi, it is found that both of them attach importance to the treatment of syndrome differentiation of Yin and Yang, strongly advocate internal treat- ment, oppose gentle external treatment and have the same academic views on treating the Yin syndrome with warm - natured drugs, etc. In other words, there is certain relationship between them that they are with the same academic sources. Wai Ke Zheng Zhi Quart Sheng Ji mainly has more advantages in the treatment of dorsal furuncle, while from the perspective of Dong Tian Ao Zhi, its relevant richer contents were discussed earlier and the viewpoints are comparatively more reasonable. Therefore, in terms of generally discussed Quansheng sect of external diseases and surgical sects that advocate internal treatment, the academic contribution of Dong Tian Ao Zhi cant be neglected and a higher academic position shall be granted to it from the perspective of academic schools of surgery.

关 键 词：外科证治全生集 王维德 洞天奥旨 陈士铎 全生派 阴阳辨证 内治 外治 

分 类 号：R22[医药卫生—中医基础理论]