检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学第三附属医院口腔科,合肥230061
出 处:《安徽医学》2012年第2期167-169,共3页Anhui Medical Journal
摘 要:目的比较3种不同方法在急性牙髓炎治疗过程中控制疼痛的效果。方法急性牙髓炎患者120例120颗患牙随机分成3组:A组(开髓引流组)、B组(冠髓去除组)和C组(冠髓-根髓去除组),每组40颗牙。3组皆在局麻下进行手术,A组仅行开随处理,B组去除冠髓组织,C组彻底去除全部牙髓组织,以0.9%氯化钠和2%H2O2液反复冲洗,然后髓腔内置樟脑酚棉球,24 h后观察和比较疼痛缓解情况。结果 B组和C组在疼痛缓解方面明显优于A组(P<0.01和P<0.05),B组和C组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但B组在治疗程序上较C组更为简便。结论冠髓去除对于急性牙髓炎患者控制疼痛是一种简单、有效、可靠的治疗方法。Objective To compare pain controlling effects of three different treatments in acute pulpitis therapy.Methods 120 cases with acute pulpitis were randomly divided into three groups: Group A(open and drainage group),Group B(coronal pulp removal group) and Group C(coronal-root pulp removal group),40 cases per group.Three groups were all operated with local anesthesia,Group A only opened pulp chambers,Group B removed coronal pulp tissues,and Group C removed the whole pulp tissues completely.repeatedly with 0.9% Nacl and 2% H2O2,then put camphor phenol tampon in cavities,observed and compared the degree of pain relief after 24 hours.Results Group B and C were significantly better than the group A in pain relief(P0.01 and P0.05),while there was no significant difference between them(P0.05),but the endodontic procedures of Group B was more simple than that of Group C.Conclusion Coronal pulp removal is a simple,effective and reliable therapeutic method to control pain of patients with acute pulpitis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.27.146