检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东医学院附属医院神经内科,湛江524001
出 处:《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》2012年第1期91-92,共2页Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
摘 要:目的探讨临床护理路径在脑梗死患者中的应用效果。方法将68例脑梗死患者随机分为实验组和对照组,每组各34例,实验组采用临床护理路径指导的护理模式,对照组采用传统医疗护理方法。结果实验组患者的平均住院日、平均住院费用明显低于对照组(P<0.05);健康知识掌握、生活自理能力恢复情况及患者满意率明显优于对照组(P<0.01)。结论临床护理路径指导的护理模式可以提高脑梗死患者对医护人员的满意度和对健康知识的知晓率,同时可以缩短住院日,优于传统的护理模式。Objective To study the effect of clinical nursing pathways (CNP) apphed m patients who have brain infarction. Methods 68 patients were divided into experimental and control groups. There were 34 cases in each group. The experimental group subjects received the nursing by CNP, While the control group subjects received traditional treatment and care. Results The subjects belonging to the experimental group had shorter hospitalization duration and less cost, compared with the ones belonging to the control group (P 〈 0.05). The experimental group also had learned and understood more health knowledge and gotten faster rehabilitation of selfcare ability and felt more satisfactory in CNP, compared with the ones belonging to the control group (P 〈 0.01). Conclusions The CNP is helpful both in enhancing the cerebral infarction patients" degree of satisfaction and in improving awareness of health knowledge; meanwhile, The CNP is helpful in decreasing the number of days spent in hospitals, it is superior to the traditional model of care.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.74