检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:封利强[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江工商大学诉讼法学研究中心
出 处:《法学研究》2012年第2期143-162,共20页Chinese Journal of Law
基 金:教育部人文社科项目"系统科学视野下的司法证明:要素;机理与规则"(10YJC820029)的阶段性成果;浙江工商大学诉讼法学研究中心重点项目"司法证明机制研究"(2010B006)的资助
摘 要:司法证明机理是指由多方证明主体共同参与进行证据推理活动的内在规律和原理。没有对证明机理的深入把握,就难以通过"证据群"获得可靠的事实认定结论。近年来,英美学者致力于对证明机理的探索,开辟了一个全新的交叉学科领域。证明机理的研究对于摆脱司法证明的现实困境具有重要意义。我们应当批判地吸收和借鉴英美"新证据学"的研究成果,综合运用系统论、逻辑学、心理学、语言学、行为科学等多种研究方法进行系统化研究,以期实现司法证明的科学化。The principles of judicial proof refer to the inherent laws and theories of the evidence reasoning activities participated jointly by all subjects of proof. They aim to reveal the complex interactive relationships among subjects of proof, means of proof and objects of proof in the course of evidence reasoning. Without the thorough understanding of the principles of proof, we cannot reach reliable conclusions by mixed masses of evidence. At present, Chinese scholars have not paid close attention to the principles of proof yet, which has been attached on the research of evidence law in the forms of experiences and skills. As a matter of fact, judicial proof depends not only on perfect evidence law but also on scientific mechanism of fact--finding. Therefore, the research of the principles of proof is of great importance for us to solve the present dilemma of judicial proof.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15