检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李岩[1] 成拾明[1] 杨欣[1] 黄锦海[1] 王勤美[1]
机构地区:[1]温州医学院眼视光学院,325027
出 处:《中华实验眼科杂志》2012年第3期262-265,共4页Chinese Journal Of Experimental Ophthalmology
基 金:眼视光行业标准化研究和创新公共平台建设项目(200802114)
摘 要:背景眼前节解剖结构的生物学测量参数对于青光眼、眼外伤的诊治及人工晶状体(IOL)度数的测量具有重要意义。目的比较Sirius与Pentacam测量前房深度及中央角膜厚度(CCT)的差异,并对两种仪器的测量结果进行一致性评价。方法收集温州医学院眼视光学院在校学生38名,其中男20人,女18人;年龄23~32岁。每位受检者右眼分别用Pentacam和Sirius对前房深度和CCT进行测量,每种仪器对每眼测量3次,取平均值进行各种仪器的重复性和一致性评价,并对两种测量结果进行差异比较和一致性评价。结果Pentacam测量的前房深度为(3.18±0.21)mm,组内相关系数(ICC)为0.995,变异系数(CV)为0.066;Sirius测量的前房深度为(3.22±0.21)mm,ICC为0.996,CV为0.065。两种仪器测量前房深度的差值为0.04mm,差异有统计学意义(t=-6.225,P〈0.05);两种仪器测量前房深度的相关系数r=0.977;95%一致性区间为(-0.04—0.13)lqlm,位于均值的1个标准差区间±0.21//ml内,此结果临床上可以接受。Pentacam测量的CCT为(535±33)μm,ICC为0.994,CV为0.062;Sirius测量的CCT为(537±36)μm,ICC为0.999,CV为0.067。两种仪器测量的CCT相差2μm,差异无统计学意义(t=1.771,P〉0.05);两种仪器测量CCT的相关系数r=0.985;95%一致性区间为(-11.64—15.65)μm,位于均值的1个标准差区间±34.27μm内,此结果临床上可以接受。结论Sirius与Pentacam测量前房深度及CCT的一致性较好,两种方法在对眼前节参数的测量时可相互替代,为临床眼前节参数的测量提供了一个新的选择。Background Biometry of the anterior ocular segment parameter is very important for the diagnosis and treatment of glaucoma and ocular injury as well as measurement of intraocular lens(IOL). Objective This study was to compare the differences in the anterior chamber depth (ACD) and the central corneal thickness (CCT) between Sirius and Pentaeam and evaluate the agreement of these two measurement methods. Methods The ACD and the CCT of 38 right eyes from 38 health volunteers aged 23-32 years were measured with both Pentacam and Sirius. Three times of measurement were performed on each eye for each method to obtain the average values. The repeatability and agreement from each method were assessed as intraelass correlation coefficient(Icc) and coefficient of variation(CV) and the agreement between these two methods were evaluated using Bland-Ahman mode. Results The mean ACD value was(3.18+0.21 )mm from Pcntacam with the ICC 0. 995 and CV 0.066. The mean ACD value from Sirius was (3.22+0.21)mm with the ICC 0. 996 and CV 0. 065. The difference value in ACD between two methods was 0.04 ram, showing a significant difference( t =-6. 225, P〈0.05 ) and a positive correlation (r = 0. 977 ) between two methods. The 95 % limit of agreement was ( -0.04--0. 13 )mm within 1 standard difference (SD) of the mean value( +0. 21ram) ,which was acceptable for clinical measurement.
关 键 词:生物学测量/Sirius PENTACAM 前房深度 中央角膜厚度 一致性
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.93.255