检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]上海市口腔病防治院口腔内科,上海200031 [2]上海市口腔病防治院口腔预防科
出 处:《中国美容医学》2012年第4期640-642,共3页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
摘 要:目的:比较微创根管治疗方法与传统治疗方法对牙冠抗折裂性能影响的差异性。方法:选择成年健康男性恒磨牙50颗,随机分为实验组和对照组。对照组按照传统根管治疗方法进行处理,实验组采用CT定位、微孔开髓法进行根管治疗。比较分析两组离体牙出现冠折裂隙时受到的最大载荷和离体牙的折裂方式。结果:实验组样本出现裂隙时受到的最大载荷为(780.12±86.50)N,对照组样本出现裂隙时受到的最大载荷为(458.72±46.19)N,两组间存在显著性差异。在所有标本试件中,16%的牙体折裂线通过髓腔中央,20%的牙体折裂线远离开髓孔边缘,最为多见的折裂方式为折裂线通过开髓孔边缘,占64%,其中对照组中发生比例更高。两组的折裂方式存在显著性差异。结论:微创根管治疗方法可降低牙冠折裂的危险性,提高根管治疗患牙的临床效果。Objective To evaluate the effect of minimally invasive root canal treatment for fractures of crown and compare it with that of conventional treatment methods. Methods Fifty healthy adult men permanent molars were randomly divided into experimental and control groups.The control group received conventional root canal treatment.The experimental group were located the root canal in facial projection by Micro CT, and received minimally invasive root canal treatment.The maximum load and fracture situation of the two groups of teeth were compared when specimens
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222