艾略特与冯至诗学中的“存在主义思想”比较研究  

A Comparative Study of Existentialism in T S Eliot's and Feng Zhi's Poetic Theories

作　　者：江玉娇[1] 奚皓晖[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江师范大学人文学院,浙江金华321004

出　　处：《浙江师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2012年第2期71-75,共5页Journal of Zhejiang Normal University(Social Sciences)

基　　金：教育部人文规划课题"中西诗学中‘共象’与‘异象’研究--透过艾略特的诗学思想"(09YJAZH09)

摘　　要：本文对比英国现代派诗人艾略特和中国现代派诗人冯至的诗学思想,发现他们的诗学包含存在主义的哲学思想,二者有其通约性和不可通约性。前者主要表现为:(1)个体生命的自觉"死亡"意识;(2)本我的绝对孤独和存在自觉意识;(3)永恒轮回中的辉煌瞬间。后者主要表现为:(1)冯至的"存在"观强调生命存在的意义,艾略特的"存在"观则强调生命生存的意义;(2)冯至的思想体现了中国文化中世俗人生"正当死生"的重要性,强调"死后的高尚",而艾略特赋予"正当死生"以宗教情怀,强调"死后的责任";(3)冯至的思想提倡伦理自觉,倡导"舍生取义",艾略特则提倡信仰自觉,呼吁"牺牲、泯灭、重建"。This paper makes a comparative study of T S Eliot, a modern English poet, and Feng Zhi, a modern Chinese poet, finding that their writings embody existentialist thoughts： the individual＇ s consciousness of ＂the natural death＂, the self-loneliness and the self-being, and the great moment of ＂death＂ for the endless reincarnation. It also argues that there is something incompatible in their thoughts. For example, Feng Zhi stresses the importance of the life-being, while Eliot emphasizes the importance of the life-forming; Feng Zhi＇ s view of ＂the natural death＂ expounds a kind of Chinese culture about the worldly death： ＂the greatness of death＂, while Eliot＇ s presents a kind of religious belief in ＂Death＂ ： ＂the obligation of death＂ ; and Feng Zhi eulogizes the general moral code： ＂dying for a just cause＂, while Eliot advocates the general religious law： ＂sacrifice＂, ＂extinction＂, and ＂recreation＂.

关 键 词：存在主义 死亡 存在 永恒轮回 

分 类 号：I106.2[文学—世界文学]