检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江理工大学经济管理学院,浙江杭州310018
出 处:《国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报)》2012年第2期87-95,共9页INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
基 金:国家社科基金(项目编号:09CGJ013);浙江省社科规划办项目(项目编号:08ZXSJD32YB);浙江理工大学研究生创新基金项目(YCX-S11025)
摘 要:运用非竞争型投入占用产出模型剔除进口中间产品的方法,构建高技术产业完全国内增加值率指标来衡量高技术产业的国际分工地位,并对高技术产业国际分工地位的影响因素进行跨国实证。结果表明:在1995-2005年期间,日本、美国的高技术产业始终处于领先地位,澳大利亚、法国、希腊、印度尼西亚等国高技术产业的国际分工地位快速提升,而中国、波兰、南非、土耳其等国则明显下降;高技术产业国际分工地位的提升主要依赖于人力资本要素尤其是创新型人力资本,研发经验和经济规模未对其国际分工地位产生积极影响。In this paper we developed a new method to measure the interna- tional specialization status of a country' s high technology industry using a "Non-Competitive input-output model" eliminating imported intermediate products, known as calculating index called "The rate of completely Domestic Value Add- ed" . At the same time, we adopted a multinational empirical analysis to find fac- tors which affect the international specialization Status of a country' s high tech- nology industry. The results show that: In the period of 1995-2005 Japan, the United States's high technology industry is always in the leading position, Aus- tralia, France, Greece, Indonesia and other countries' high technology industries international specialization status promote quickly, China, Poland, South Africa, Turkey and other countries' obviously decrease; High technology industries inter- national specialization cially innovative human a positive impact on its status ascension mainly depends on human capital ,espe- capital, neither R&D experience nor economic scale has international specialization status.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15