检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学脑与认知科学研究院,北京100875 [2]北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室,北京100875
出 处:《应用心理学》2011年第4期325-330,共6页Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
基 金:全国教育科学规划教育部青年课题(EHA090429);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(11YJC190013)
摘 要:通过前测-训练-后测的实验程序,首先让22名五年级小学生和29名大学一年级学生分别在纯听或视听训练条件下学习知觉语音/s/和/θ/,然后对训练后他们产出语音/s/和/θ/的效果进行比较,以此来探讨不同语音知觉训练方式对儿童和成人语音产出的迁移作用。结果发现:(1)对于儿童来说,接受视听训练的被试在产出语音/s/和/θ/的准确性等级上的提高显著高于纯听训练被试;(2)对于大学生来说,接受两种训练的被试在产出/s/和/θ/的准确性等级上的提高率没有显著差异。以上结果表明,视听训练方式对语音产出的促进作用在儿童身上更加明显,早期的视听双通道语音知觉训练非常重要。The study explored the effect of different training ways of phonetic perception on children and adults' phonetic production using the procedures of pretest, training and post-test. In the preand posttest, 22 primary school students in Grade 5 and 29 freshmen were required to produce the/s/and/θ/. During the training process, half of the children and adults learn to discriminate the/s/and/θ/ under audio-only modality, and another half under the au- dio-visual modality, all of the training lasted for ten days, and thirty minutes each day. The results showed that all the children and adults performed significantly better at the post-test than the pretest;as far as the improvement from the pre-test to the post-test, the children with audio-visual training performed significantly better than the ones with au- dio-only training, while there was no significant difference between two groups of adults. It implicated that during the early English teaching, the audio-visual teaching or learning way maybe effective for children to improve their English phonetic percep- tion and production.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.186