检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京大学医学院附属口腔医院牙体牙髓科,江苏南京210008 [2]南京大学医学院附属口腔医院第四门诊部
出 处:《广东牙病防治》2012年第3期144-146,共3页Journal of Dental Prevention and Treatment
摘 要:目的研究Raypex 5和Elements Diagnostic 2种根尖定位仪测量根管长度的准确性。方法收集40颗单根管下颌前磨牙,首先借助K锉测定实际根管长度,然后再分别使用Raypex 5和Elements Diagnostic 2种根尖定位仪测定根管长度,得到电测长度与实际长度的差值,对结果进行分析比较。结果 Raypex 5根管长度测量的准确率是87.5%,Elements Diagnostic 92.5%,两者准确率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论临床使用2种根尖定位仪对根管长度的确定都是较为精确和有效的。Objective To evaluate the accuracy of Raypex 5 and Elements Diagnostic electronic apex locators(EALs) in measuring root canal length.Methods Forty extracted single root canal mandibular premolars were used.The actual length was measured with an aid of 15# K file,and electronic length was measured separately with Raypex 5 and Elements Diagnostic EALs.The results obtained with each EAL were compared with the corresponding actual length.Results The percentage of correct measurements of Raypex 5 was 87.5%,while Elements Diagnostic was 92.5%,and there were no statistically significant differences between the two devices.Conclusion Both EALs provided an accurate and useful determination of the root canal length.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28