检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]复旦大学附属华山医院宝山分院呼吸科,上海200062
出 处:《临床肺科杂志》2012年第5期892-893,共2页Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine
摘 要:目的对良恶性胸腔积液(胸液)病理细胞学、癌胚抗原(CEA)和铁蛋白(FT)检测进行对比研究。方法比较分析48例癌性胸液和32例结核性胸液的临床表现、影像学表现、血清及胸液CEA、FT测定结果。结果 48例癌性胸液为血性40例,32例结核性胸液为血性8例,恶性胸液CEA、FT比其血清CEA、FT明显升高(P<0.05),同结核性胸液比也较之升高(P<0.05)。结论病理细胞学检查可确诊癌性胸液,CEA、FT检测可以提高该病的检出率。Objective To investigate the ways of cytopathology,CEA and FT in diagnosing benign and malignant pleural effusion.Methods 48 cases diagnosed as malignant pleural effusion and 32 cases of benign pleural effusion were reviewed and compared by clinical observations,chest X-ray and CT,level of CEA and FT in pleural effusion and serum.Results 40 of 48 cases diagnosed as malignant pleural effusion and 8 of 32 as benign pleural effusion were bloody pleural fluid.The levels of CEA and FT in malignant pleural effusion were significantly higher than those in serum(P0.05),and higher than those in tuberculosis pleural effusion(P0.05).Conclusions Cytopathology can make a confirmed diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion.Evaluation of CEA and FT in pleural effusion can improve the differential diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion from benign pleural effusion and significantly increase the sensitivity of diagnosis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.9.230