检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西北大学,陕西西安710127
出 处:《西安建筑科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2012年第1期36-41,53,共7页Journal of Xi'an University of Architecture & Technology(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:以往研究董事会治理与公司业绩关系的文献中,大都认为二者之间是一种静态关系,重在考察两者在当期的相互影响,结果得到了不尽一致的研究结论。本文以我国沪、深两市2001~2010年间653家上市公司为研究对象,构建了动态面板数据模型,运用GMM估计方法,考察了董事会治理与公司业绩之间的跨期影响,研究发现:(1)不论在当期还是跨期,董事会规模与公司业绩之间的关系都非常弱;(2)在当期,董事会独立性对公司业绩没有显著的促进效应,而公司业绩对董事会独立性却存在明显的反馈效应;(3)从跨期来看,董事会独立性对公司业绩具有正面影响。这些来自中国资本市场经验数据的研究结论对于我国上市公司治理路径的选择具有重要的借鉴意义。Since the former study of between the board governance and the corporate performance in the current period, the previous literatures believed that there existed a static relationship between them. In this paper, we establish a dynamic panel data model with the analysis of 653 listed compa- nies in Shanghai and Shenzhen, China, from 2001 to 2010, and assess the intertemporal interaction between their board governance and corporate performance by using GMM estimation. It is found: (1) whether currently or intertemporally, the size of board and the performance of corporation are not significantly correlated; (2) in the current period, the board independence lacks obvious interacting effect on corporate performance, but conversely the corporate performance has a significant feedback effect on board independence; (3) intertemporally, the board independence has a positive effect on corporate performance. The result found from those experiential data of Chinese capital market is of significance, from which China's listed companies could learn to make their governance options.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.189.184.99