检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《水电能源科学》2012年第4期202-204,158,共4页Water Resources and Power
基 金:科技部2010年度公益性行业(气象)科研专项基金资助项目(GYHY201006036)
摘 要:以吉林省乾安县光伏试验电站为例,基于近1年每3min发电量数据,统计了固定式、单轴跟踪式、单晶硅电池、多晶硅电池的发电量,在剔除缺测和不合理数据的基础上,对比了不同方式、不同材料下的光伏发电效率,并分析了固定式与单轴跟踪式的优劣与性价比。结果表明,单轴跟踪式光伏发电效率较高,多晶硅效率比单晶硅高,单轴式多晶硅系统性价比最高。Takiing the experimental photovoltaic power plant in Qian'an city for an example, the generated energy of fixed type PV, single-axis tracking type PV, single crystal and polycrystalline silicon cells is statistical with generation data for each 3min of nearly one year. Based on eliminating unreasonable data, photovo[taic power generation efficiency of different type and different materials are compared. And then the performance-to-price ratio, advantages and disadvanta- ges of fixed type PV and single-axis tracking type PV are analyzed. The results show that single-axis tracking type has higher photovoltaic power generation efficiency; generation efficiency of polycrystalline silicon ceils is higher than that of single crystal cells; combination of single-axis tracking type PV and polycrystalline silicon cells has the highest performance-to-price ratio.
关 键 词:固定式 单轴跟踪式 单晶硅 多晶硅 光伏发电 性价比
分 类 号:TK511[动力工程及工程热物理—热能工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28