检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:牙祖科[1] 陶人川[1] 曾启新[1] 陈东晖[1] 马飞[1]
机构地区:[1]广西医科大学附属口腔医院牙周黏膜科,南宁530021
出 处:《广西医科大学学报》2012年第1期61-64,共4页Journal of Guangxi Medical University
基 金:广西青年科学基金资助项目(No.桂科青0728068);广西教育厅资助项目(No.200610MS114)
摘 要:目的:比较一次性全口龈下刮治(full-mouth scaling and root planning,FM-SRP)与分象限龈下刮治(quadrant scaling androot planning,Q-SRP)对慢性牙周炎的临床疗效。方法:选择需进行牙周治疗的慢性牙周炎患者54例,分为FM-SRP组27例和Q-SRP组27例进行治疗,观察治疗前、治疗3,6个月后牙周探诊深度(Probing Depth,PD)、牙周附着水平(Attachment Lev-el,AL)、探诊后出血(Bleeding on Probing,BOP)的变化,并记录患者术后疼痛(VAS)评分和止痛药使用情况及术后是否有发热症状。结果:两组龈下刮治后3,6个月后PD、AL、BOP均较治疗前改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);但两组治疗后上述指标相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后FM-SRP组VAS评分高于Q-SRP组(P<0.05);术后两组均有患者出现发热症状,但两组平均体温差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:FM-SRP和Q-SRP均可获得良好的临床疗效,但FM-SRP术后全身反应稍明显,临床医生可根据患者实际情况选择适宜的治疗方式。Objective: To evaluate the effect of full-mouth scaling and root planning with quadrant scaling and root planning on chronic periodontitis.Methods: Fifty-four patients had finished super-scaling were divided into 2 groups,FM-SRP group administrated full-mouth scaling at one time,and Q-SRP group divided full-month into four quadrant to finish scaling and root planning at four times.Probing depth(PD),bleeding on probe(BOP) and attachment level(AL) were examined,if patient had uncomfortable and fever also was collected.Results: Both treatment modalityes led to significant clinical improvement at any time.After 3 and 6 months,PD,AL and BOP of two groups both decreased significantly but there was no difference between two groups.As compared with Q-SRP group,visual analogue scale(VAS) of the FM-SRP group was significantly increased after treatment.Fever in both groups was occurred but there was no difference in mean body temperature between the two groups.Conclusion: FM-SRP and Q-SRP both could decrease periodontal inflammation,FM-SRP did not provide clinically relevant advantages over Q-SRP,but FM-SRP could increase uncomfortable after treatment.The clinician should select the treatment modality based on practical considerations related to patient preference and clinical workload.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.206.193