检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邹冰[1] 王明春[2] 陈图农[1] 柯晓燕[1] 詹明心[2] 陈一心[1]
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学附属脑科医院儿童心理卫生研究中心,江苏南京210029 [2]南京医科大学,江苏南京210029
出 处:《中国儿童保健杂志》2012年第4期317-319,339,共4页Chinese Journal of Child Health Care
基 金:国家科技支撑计划心理疾患防治研究与示范项目(2009BAI77B05)
摘 要:【目的】探讨孤独症患儿父母的依恋特征。【方法】采用横断面调查研究。用亲密关系经历量表、关系问卷及自制调查表对68例孤独症患儿父母及136名正常儿童的父母进行问卷调查,对照研究。【结果】两组父亲依恋类型分布差异无统计学意义(χ2=4.574,P>0.05),两组母亲依恋类型分布差异无统计学意义(χ2=4.294,P>0.05)。孤独症患儿父亲在依恋焦虑维度得分明显高于正常对照组,但两组差异无统计学意义(t=-1.958,P>0.05),在依恋回避维度得分两组父亲差异无统计学意义(t=0.309,P>0.05);在依恋焦虑和回避维度得分两组母亲差异均无统计学意义(t焦虑=-0.667;t回避=-0.968,P>0.05)。【结论】孤独症患儿父母的依恋类型分布与正常儿童父母的依恋类型分布无差异。【Objective】 Explore the characteristics of attachment of autistic children's parent. 【Methods】 It was a cross-sectional study based on the comparison of the assessment result of 68 autism children's parents and 135 normal controls' parents.Using Experiences in Close Relationship inventory(ECR).Relationship Questionnaire(RQ) and self-produced questionnaire. 【Results】 There was no significant difference between two groups in neither fathers' attachment type(χ2=4.574,P〉0.05)nor in mothers' attachment type(χ2=4.294,P〉0.05).Scores in attachment anxiety dimension of autistic children's fathers were higher than the control group without showing significant difference(t=-1.958,P〉0.05).No significant difference was found in attachment avoidance dimension between two groups of fathers.There was no significant difference in attachment anxiety dimension and avoidance dimension between two groups of mothers. 【Conclusion】 No significant difference is found in attachment avoidance dimension between two groups of fathers.There is no significant difference in attachment anxiety dimension and avoidance dimension between two groups of mothers.
分 类 号:R749.94[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222