检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张娟娟[1]
出 处:《温州大学学报(自然科学版)》2012年第2期49-54,共6页Journal of Wenzhou University(Natural Science Edition)
摘 要:当前,我国在食品安全、安全生产、环境保护等领域,损害事件频繁发生,民事主体的合法权益常常因此受损.在我国现行立法和司法实践中,作为私法主体的企业与作为公权力主体的行政机关之间的责任划分不明确,导致无法对违法行政行为进行有效惩戒,也无法对权益受损的民事主体进行有效救济."公私法主体之侵权责任的融通性"可以为解决这一问题提供一个思路.具体而言,即在处理《国家赔偿法》与《侵权责任法》的关系上,应将民法的相关原理引入到《国家赔偿法》的适用中,使对行政主体的民事赔偿归责得以在现有民事法律理论的视域下展开.Nowadays,torts in food security,safety production and environmental protection are springing up in large numbers and they often infringe the legitimate rights of civil subjects.In practice of existing legislation and judiciary,division of liabilities between enterprise(as the subject of private law) and administrative agency(as the subject of public authority) is not clear,which leads to not only inability to punish the unlawful administrative acts effectively but also inability to give effective remedy for the civil subjects whose rights are infringed."Accommodation of tort liabilities between subject of public law and subject of private law" can provide a proposal for resolving the problem.In detail,in dealing with the relationship between State Compensation Law and Tort Law,the related principles of civil law should be introduced to application of State Compensation Law so that attribution of civil compensation of administrative subjects can be carried out under the horizon of existing civil legal theory.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171