对盗窃在他人保管之下的本人财物行为的刑法评价  

Evaluations by Criminal Law on Stealing One's Own Property in the Custody of Others

作　　者：沈志民[1] 

机构地区：[1]广州大学法学院

出　　处：《北方法学》2012年第2期38-43,共6页Northern Legal Science

基　　金：2009年广州市教育局课题"刑法占有理论及其适用"(项目编号09AC015)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：对盗窃在他人保管之下的本人财物行为如何定性,涉及财产罪保护法益范围、盗窃罪故意与非法占有目的内容以及《刑法》第91条第二款的理解等刑法理论问题。合法占有权并非一概都能对抗所有权,对盗窃在他人保管之下的本人财物行为,如果没有索赔或接受赔偿不能构成盗窃罪;反之,如果又进行索赔或接受赔偿的则构成盗窃罪。How to define stealth of one＇ s own property in the custody of others arouse several theoretical issues of criminal law, such as the scope of interests protected in property crimes, the intention in the crime of stealth ; the content of possession with illegal purpose ; and the interpretation of the second paragraph in Article 91 of the Criminal Law. Since not all legal possession can be defensive against ownership, stealth of one＇s own property in the custody of others will not constitute crime of theft without claims for damages or acceptance of damages. Conversely, the crime of theft will be satisfied upon claims for damages or having accepted dama- ges.

关 键 词：财产犯罪 保护法益 所有权 占有 

分 类 号：DF611[政治法律—刑法学]