检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学文学院,北京100872 [2]海南师范大学文学院,海南海口571158 [3]上海大学文学院,上海200444
出 处:《海南师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2012年第2期39-46,共8页Journal of Hainan Normal University(Social Sciences)
基 金:上海市第三期重点学科中国现当代文学资助项目(编号:S30101)
摘 要:1979年前后,伴随"文革"结束,针对如何看待"十七年文艺"等问题,文艺界一度产生的共识开始破裂,出现了不同的意见和派别,以林默涵、刘白羽等为代表的一方坚持维护"十七年"开展文艺运动与批判的合法性被视作"保守派"或"偏左派",而以周扬、陈荒煤、冯牧等为代表的一方则将"十七年文艺"所存在的问题定义为"左"的错误并试图推动正在进行中的"新时期文学"超越"十七年文艺"的主导框架则被视作"思想解放派"或"惜春派"。这场分歧表明:文学史书写的内容和对象并不是一个"客观存在"之物,同一段历史可以因为不同的评价标准和阐释框架而变得迥然相异。In the literary and artistic circles, views and schools were divided on the "seventeen-year literature and art" along with the end of the "Cultural Revolution" around 1979. On one hand, scholars of one school represented by Lin Mohan and Liu Baiyu were considered "conservatives" or "pro-leftists" because of their persistence in vindicating the legitimacy of literary and artistic movements and criticism implemented during the "seventeen years" ; on the other hand, scholars of another school commissared by Zhou Yang, Chen Huangmei, Feng Mu, etc. were regarded as "liberal-minded scholars" or "progressives" because of their view on the "seventeen-year literature and art" as well as their attempt to promote the ongoing "literature of the new period" beyond the dominant framework of the "seventeen-year literature and art". As is shown by this ramification, the contents and objectives in the writing of literary history are not matters of "objective reality", for the history of one section can be rather disparate due to different evaluation criteria and elaboration frameworks.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.116.193