检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖南大学经济与贸易学院,湖南长沙410079 [2]中国科学院系统科学研究所,北京100090 [3]长沙理工大学经济与管理学院,湖南长沙410004
出 处:《中国工业经济》2012年第4期89-101,共13页China Industrial Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"大股东控制与上市公司治理均衡研究"(批准号10CGL039);教育部人文社会科学基金项目"整体上市的环境;模式与绩效研究"(批准号09YJA790064);教育部人文社会科学青年项目"基于流动性约束的大宗股权定价研究"(批准号09YJC90231);湖南省社会科学基金项目"市场创新;制度设计与风险防范"(批准号08YBA165)
摘 要:本文引入不含利益倾向性判断的"股东利益均衡"概念,提出均衡判断方法,并发展了一个"环境—模式—效率—股东利益均衡"(EME-E)的分析范式,考察资产重组中的股东利益分配问题。研究发现,整体上市这类大股东主导的重组现象在表面上是"支撑行为",但其重组效率为负,表明股东利益并不均衡,小股东的利益可能被侵占。该发现有助于解释大股东为何从消极的上市公司"救火队员"转向积极的"锦上添花"。进一步分析显示,一些模式和环境的重组绩效相对较差,与更严重的股东利益不均衡相联系,其形成机理在于大股东受到的监控和约束相对更宽松。本文认为,重组模式和环境的选择等内部治理机制有助于缓解但难以消除股东利益不均衡,尚需引入外部治理机制以有效制约大股东的机会主义行为,进行策略创新和制度创新以实现股东利益均衡。A new concept ‘equilibrium of shareholders’ benefits' was put forward to analyze the corporate governance in the asset reorganization,without prejudgment on interests of shareholders'.And a new way was suggested to evaluate the equilibrium based on modes analysis and input-output efficiency with improved FA-DEA method.Then a new paradigm of EME-E(environment,mode,efficiency and equilibrium of shareholders' benefits) was built and used to analyze corporate governance with the cases of holistic listing in China,a sort of big-scale asset reorganization leaded by controlling shareholders.The analysis of theory model shows:if the performance score is negative,controlling shareholders seize the benefits of minor shareholders.The empirical results show that:①Holistic listing produced negative influence,which means that there exists disequilibrium of shareholders benefits and the loss of minor shareholders' benefits.Which helps us understand why large shareholders add a beautiful thing to a contrasting beautiful thing now instead of acting a role of fireman to listed companies.②Reorganizations performance in some modes and environment are relatively worse.The common point of them is that the supervision on controlling shareholders is relatively loose,which may be the important reason of worse disequilibrium of shareholders benefits.③Internal governance mechanism is not enough to solve the problem of disequilibrium.And external governance mechanism is necessary.At last the policy meaning on innovation of strategies and institutional is discussed to improve performance and realize equilibrium of shareholders benefits.
关 键 词:资产重组 “环境—模式—效率—股东利益均衡”范式 投入产出效率 治理机制
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.4