检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩建涛[1] 邹长华[1] 信中贵[1] 葛明贵[2]
机构地区:[1]中国.安徽巢湖学院教育系,238000 [2]安徽师范大学教育科学学院
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2012年第3期466-469,共4页China Journal of Health Psychology
基 金:安徽巢湖学院2010年度院级人文社科一般项目(编号:XWY-201016)
摘 要:目的修订由W illiam s和D eci编制的学生对教师的自主支持感量表—学习气氛问卷(The L earn ing C lim ateQ uestionna ire,LCQ)。方法用修订的自主支持感量表对安徽省2所中学464名初中生进行测试,并对修订量表的信、效度进行分析。结果修订量表中的各项目有较好的区分度;探索性因素分析结果显示,修订的自主支持感量表是单维的,这与原量表结构一致,单因素潜变量可解释总方差的43.73%;CFA对此结构模型进行了验证,其中χ2/d f=2.74,GF I=0.88,AGF I=0.83,NF I=0.92,RM SEA=0.074,CF I=0.95,各项拟合指数均符合测量学要求;另外,修订量表的内部一致性系数达0.89,分半信度为0.81,重测信度为0.73。结论修订版的自主支持感量表具有较好的信度和效度,可用于初中生积极心理的进一步研究。Objective To revise the Learning Climate Questionnaire(LCQ)developed by Williams and Deci.Method The revised scale was conducted totest 464 junior middle school students,and examined its reliability and validity.Results The item discrimination of revised LCQ was acceptable.Exploratory factor analysis revealed that the structure was consistent with the original scale,the revised scale was a structure of one-dimensional,single-factor latent variable explained 43.7% of the total variance.CFA had conducted some validation,which χ2/df=2.74,GFI=0.88,AGFI=0.83,NFI=0.92,RMSEA=0.074,CFI=0.95,each fit index was positive.In addition,internal consistency coefficient of the revised scale was 0.89,split-half reliability was 0.81,retest reliability was 0.73.Conclusion The revised scale has good reliability and validity.It can be used in the related research.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.185