检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王中海[1] 乐爱文[1] 单莉莉[1] 肖天慧[1] 卓蓉[1] 沈怡[2]
机构地区:[1]广东医学院附属深圳市第六人民医院(南山医院)妇产科,深圳518052 [2]华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院妇产科,武汉430022
出 处:《中国微创外科杂志》2012年第4期312-315,共4页Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
基 金:深圳市南山区科学技术局项目(2008013)
摘 要:目的探讨腹腔镜广泛子宫切除加淋巴结清扫术治疗子宫恶性肿瘤的可行性及临床效果。方法回顾分析2007年3月~2011年12月42例腹腔镜手术与同期46例开腹手术行子宫广泛切除、淋巴结清扫治疗的子宫恶性肿瘤的临床资料,比较2组的术中、术后情况。结果与开腹组相比,腹腔镜组术中出血量少[(303.4±118.2)ml vs.(407.6±120.2)ml,t=-4.094,P=0.000],切除淋巴结多[(27.5±5.1)个vs.(20.6±4.3)个,t=6.881,P=0.000],术后排气早[(1.5±0.5)d vs.(2.1±0.6)d,t=-5.069,P=0.000];2组手术病理分期、手术时间、术后并发症的发生率差异无显著性。结论腹腔镜下治疗子宫恶性肿瘤创伤小,恢复快,是一种安全有效的手术方法。Objective To explore the efficacy of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for early-stage malignant uterine tumors.Methods Totally 88 patients with malignant uterine cancers received hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy from March 2007 to December 2011 in our hospital.The patients were divided into laparoscopy group(42 cases) and open surgery group(46 cases) according to the surgical approach.The intra-and post-operative data were compared between the two groups.Results The laparoscopy group showed significantly less intraoperative blood loss,more resected lymph nodes,and shorter postoperative gastrointestinal recovery time than the open surgery group [(303.4±118.2) ml vs.(407.6±120.2) ml,t=-4.094,P=0.000;27.5±5.1 vs.20.6±4.3,t=6.881,P=0.000;(1.5±0.5) d vs.(2.1±0.6) d,t=-5.069,P=0.000].However,no significant difference existed in the postoperative pathological staging,operation time,and rate of postoperative complications between the two groups.Conclusions Laparoscopy is a safe,effective and minimally invasive procedure for malignant uterine cancer.Patients recove quickly after the operation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.73.161