检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴歆[1] 徐云生 朱澜[1] 黄世忠 钟冰 赵蔚菠 莫烘霞 黄守勤
机构地区:[1]广西壮族自治区人民医院,广西南宁530021 [2]广西南宁市天桃实验小学
出 处:《中国民康医学》2012年第7期771-774,共4页Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
基 金:课题编码:桂教科学2008B70
摘 要:目的:研究和评价感觉统合训练(Sensory integration training,SIT)干预儿童学习障碍效果。方法:将符合学习障碍(Learningdisorder,LD)诊断标准的6~8岁的一年级儿童(n=60)随机均匀分为研究组:感觉统合训练组(n=30);对照组:不干预组(n=30)。采用儿童感觉统合能力发展评定量表、瑞文标准推理测试进行评估,记录干预前后的语文和数学的同期考试成绩评价疗效。结果:两组的瑞文标准推理评分、儿童感觉统合能力发展评定量表评分、语文成绩和数学成绩干预前后测试结果有显著性差异,P﹤0.05。训练组干预效果明显好于对照组,P﹤0.05。结论:感觉统合训练可以有效地治疗儿童学习障碍。Objective:To study and evaluate the effects of Sensory integration training(SIT)for Learning disorder(LD).Methods:60 patients who were grade 1,6-8 year-old children,and met the criteria for LD were randomized into two groups: the SIT group(n= 30) and the nonintervention group(n=30).The Children sensory integration ability development scale(CSIADS) and the Raven’s standard progressive matrices(SPM) were conducted,and the Chinese marks and Mathematics marks were recorded before and after treatment to evaluate the efficacy of the treatments.Results: In two groups,before and after treatment the CSIADS scores,RSPM scores,the marks of Chinese and the marks of Mathematics were significantly different,P〈0.05.The results of the SIT group were better than that of the nonintervention group,P〈0.05.Conclusions: the Sensory integration training could effectively treat learning disorder.
分 类 号:R749.94[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30