检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵伟[1] 刘桂萍[1] 张华[2] 蔡莹莹[2] 李栓荣[3]
机构地区:[1]郑州大学护理学院,河南省郑州市450052 [2]郑州大学第一附属医院精神科 [3]河南省精神病医院护理部
出 处:《中国全科医学》2012年第11期1238-1241,共4页Chinese General Practice
摘 要:目的探讨大学生强迫症的发生与个人应对方式、家庭环境和父母教养方式的关系。方法采用特质应对方式问卷、家庭环境量表中文版和父母教养方式评价量表中文版对94例大学生强迫症和102例健康对照者进行问卷调查。结果病例组的积极应对、亲密度、情感表达、娱乐性、父母的情感温暖、理解评分明显低于对照组(P<0.05),病例组的矛盾性、父亲的惩罚、严厉评分明显高于对照组(P<0.05);Logistic回归分析显示家庭环境的矛盾性(OR=1.424)是大学生强迫症的危险因素,积极应对(OR=0.672)、亲密度(OR=0.601)和情感表达(OR=0.608)是强迫症的保护因素。结论积极应对方式、家庭成员的亲密度、情感表达和矛盾性是大学生强迫症的影响因素。Objective To explore the relationships between university students with obsessive-compulsive disorder and personal coping style,family environment and parents′ nurturing styles.Methods The study was carried out among 94 college studengs with obsessive-compulsive disorder and 102 controls without mental disorder with the help of the Trait Coping Style Questionnaire,Family Environment Scale-Chinese Version(FES-CV)and the Egma Minnen av Bardndosnauppforsffan(EMBU)of Chinese Version.Results The scores of case groups were lower than those of normal controls in positive coping style,cohesion,emotional expression,entertainment,parents emotional warmth and understanding(P〈0.05),but higher in contradictions,fathers′ punishments and strictness(P〈0.05).Logistic regression analysis showed that the contradictions of the family environment(OR=1.424) was a risk factor for obsessive-compulsive disorder of university students and positive coping style(OR=0.672),cohesion(OR=0.601) and emotional expression(OR=0.608) were the protective factors.Conclusion Positive coping style,the intimacy of family members,emotional expression and contradictions are the influencing factors for university students with obsessive-compulsive disorder.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249