检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:房乐宪[1]
出 处:《教学与研究》2012年第4期81-87,共7页Teaching and Research
基 金:教育部人文社科重点研究基地立项课题"比较区域一体化:欧洲的经验与东亚的现实"(项目号:06JJDGJW011)阶段性成果
摘 要:理性选择制度主义作为新制度主义的重要分支,在制度内涵及核心假设方面都有其特点,自20世纪80年代末被应用于欧共体/欧盟研究以来,其学术研究不断取得新进展,特别是它对欧洲一体化为何制度化以及如何被制度化提供了一个比较精细的理解,受到学界关注。本文试图概括分析理性选择制度主义的基本特征及核心假设,阐析其对欧盟制度运作的经典解释,并就其理论解释优势及局限性进行思考和总结。As an important branch of new institutionalism,rational choice institutionalism is characterized by its connotation of institution and core assumptions.Since it was applied to academic studies of European Community/European Union in the late 1980s,new progress has been continuously achieved.A particular contribution of rational choice institutionalism is its provision of an precise understanding of the reason why European integration is institutionalized and how this is realized.Naturally it has gained much attention from the academia.This paper attempts to summarize the general features and core assumptions of rational choice institutionalism,and clarify its classical interpretation of the EU institutionalized operation.Discussions of and reflections on the theoretical advantages and limitations of this approach are also presented..
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80