青少年担忧倾向性问卷的编制  被引量:5

Development of the Worry Tendency Questionnaire for Chinese Adolescents

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:林荣茂[1] 严由伟[1] 唐向东[2] 蔡韦龄[3] 

机构地区:[1]福建师范大学教育学院,福州350007 [2]四川大学华西医院睡眠医学中心,成都610041 [3]福州大学阳光学院,福州350012

出  处:《中国心理卫生杂志》2012年第4期293-298,共6页Chinese Mental Health Journal

基  金:国家自然科学基金(30870891);福建省社科规划基金(2011B077)

摘  要:目的:编制一份适合我国青少年的担忧倾向性问卷(WTQ-CA),并验证其信效度。方法:依照"我担忧测验"获得担忧倾向性结构,综合考虑人格倾向性特征,编制了59个项目的初始问卷。分别从福建、江西的普通中小学和大学抽取600名、1400名学生作为预测样本和正式施测样本,收回有效问卷582份、1265份。从正式施测样本中抽取60名学生间隔2周后进行再测,收回有效问卷59份。用预测样本进行项目分析和探索性因素分析,正式施测样本进行验证性因素分析、信度分析和效标效度检验,选用宾州担忧问卷中文版(Ch-PSWQ)、状态-特质焦虑问卷(STAI)、自评抑郁量表(SDS)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)、简易应对方式问卷(SCSQ)和Frost完美主义问卷(FMPS)为效标。结果:探索性因素分析抽取了学习担忧、关系担忧、健康担忧、未来盲目性和缺乏信心5个因素,共32个项目,累计方差解释率为54.25%;验证性因素分析验证了结构的有效性,各拟合指数分别是χ2/df=3.58,RM SEA=0.06,SRM R=0.05,NNFI=0.87,CFI=0.90;总问卷的内部一致性系数为0.92,各维度的α系数在0.67~0.83之间;总问卷的重测信度为0.74,各维度重测信度在0.68~0.79之间;问卷与各效标间的相关系数在0.14~0.58(均P<0.001)。结论:青少年担忧倾向性问卷具有良好的心理测量学特征,适用于我国青少年担忧倾向性的相关研究。Objective: To develop the Worry Tendency Questionnaire for Chinese Adolescents (WTQ-CA), and examine its reliability and validity. Methods: The 59-items original questionnaire was designed on the basis of the deliberation of the structure and the correspondingly compiling questionnaire of worrying content and personality tendency. The forecast sample of 600 adolescents and the test sample of 1400 adolescents were separately recruited from by mixed sampling, and 582 and 1265 were validity, respectively. The re-test sample 60 adolescents which were sampled from the test sample fulfilled WTQ-CA again after 2 weeks, and 59 were validity. The forecast sample was conducted with item analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and then the test sample was conducted with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), criteria validity test and reliability analysis. The criterions were the Chi- nese Version of Penn State Worry Questionnaire (Ch-PSWQ), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Self-Rating Depression scale (SDS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Frost's Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (FMPS). Results: Five factors, totally 32 items, were extracted by EFA, which were "learning worry", "health wor-ry", "relationship worry", "aimlessness" and "inferiority", and explained 54. 25% of the total variance. This 5-factors construct was confirmed by CFA (x2/df = 3.58, RMSEA - 0. 06, SRMR = 0. 05, NNFI = 0. 87, CFI = 0. 90). The internal consistency reliability of the full questionnaire score was 0. 92, and those of five factors were 0. 67 0. 83. The re-test reliability of full questionnaire was 0. 74, and those of five factors were 0. 68 - 0. 79. The questionnaire scores were significantly correlated with PSWQ, State Anxiety, Trait Anxiety, Depression, Perfectionism, Coping Style, and PSQI scores (r = 0. 14 -0. 58, Ps 〈 0.1301). Conclusion: It suggests that Worry Tendency Questionnaire for Chinese Adolescents (WTQ-CA) has good reliability

关 键 词:担忧倾向性 青少年 问卷编制 

分 类 号:G449.5[哲学宗教—心理学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象