检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:耿鹏[1] 牛跃平[1] 任潇毅[1] 杜绍先[1]
出 处:《实用医学杂志》2012年第8期1271-1272,共2页The Journal of Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的:评价普迪斯线在胃肠道肿瘤手术中关腹的效果。方法:回顾性比较2002-2004年和2008-2010年间两组各120例患者,分析丝线分层关腹组和普迪斯线全层关腹组的数据源,比较两组患者术中情况及术后并发症的发生率。结果:全层缝合组手术耗时明显比分层缝合组少[(5.21±0.78)minvs.(10.56±0.97)min],且术中不宜发生腹膜撕裂;切口感染、脂肪液化和切口裂开两组间比较有明显差异(P<0.05);全层缝合组出现切口疝1例(0.83%),分层缝合组4例(3.33%),两组之间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:胃肠道肿瘤手术中应用普迪斯线进行全层连续缝合关腹是一种安全、快捷、有效的方法,值得临床推广。Objective To evaluate the efficacy of PDS Ⅱ in abdominal closing in gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Methods Data from 120 patients from 2002 to 2004 received layered suture and 120 patients from 2008 to 2010 received single-layer suture with PDS Ⅱ were compared retrospectively. Results The operation time in single- layer suture group was less than that in layered suture group significantly [ (5.21 ± 0.78) min vs. ( 10.56 ± 0.97) min ], and peritoneal tear was rare happened. There were significant differences in the rates of incision infection, fat liquefaction, and incision disruption between the two groups (P 〈 0.05). There were 1 case (0.83%) with incision hernia in single-layer suture group and 4 cases (3.33%) in layered suture group (P 〉 0.05). Conclusions The application of PDS Ⅱ in single-layer suture for abdominal closing in gastrointestinal cancer surgery is a safe, efficient, and effective way.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229