检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王鸿博[1]
机构地区:[1]北方工业大学
出 处:《外国文学研究》2012年第2期63-71,共9页Foreign Literature Studies
摘 要:《摩诃婆罗多》中大量"咒祝"文化现象反映了婆罗门种姓在婆罗门教社会中的特殊身份及职能。当史诗人物触犯了某种天然或人(神)为的禁规,诅咒便成为惩罚的方式。在史诗中,这一主题呈现为(设禁)→违禁→惩罚→解除(或实现)的结构。印度史诗叙事的特点在于"设禁"环节的缺失,这主要因为史诗时代婆罗门教法体系化,禁忌观念已然形成,而咒语向祝祷转化透露出远古巫术向系统化宗教的嬗变。史诗故事最能推动情节发展的环节是"解除"(实现)。梵剧《沙恭达罗》对插话《沙恭达罗》的加工,利用的正是"诅咒"的经典叙事。The recurrence of the theme of Curse and Prayer in Mahabharata reflects the speical status and function of Brahman in the Brahmin society.Curse is a natural way of punishment when an epical figure violates a law of nature or of god.The theme of Curse is usually developed in the structure of"laying down a law →violation of the law →curse as punishment of the criminal → extrication from or realization of curse".However,Indian epic is characterized by the absence of"laying down a law",and this is attributed to the systematization of Brahmamism in the epical times when the concept of law had already been formed.Further,the transition from Curse to Prayer as a punishment also indicates the change from the prehistoric witchcraft to systematized religion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.225.7.106