从刑事诉讼法48条谈鉴定意见的证明力  

On the Probative Force of Appraisal Opinions from the Amendment of A.48 of Criminal Procedure Law

作　　者：李剑[1] 张德英[1] 

机构地区：[1]贵州警官职业学院,贵州贵阳550005

出　　处：《贵阳市委党校学报》2012年第2期41-44,共4页Journal of the Party School of Guiyang Committee of C.P.C

基　　金：科学证据在司法实践中的证明效力问题研究(编号:10QN46)

摘　　要：在司法实践中,随着科学技术的发展,鉴定技术的运用越来越广泛。由于鉴定技术的专业性、科学性,法庭很少会去质疑鉴定结论的科学可靠性。但实际上,鉴定结论并无预定的证明力,它本质上应该是一种专家意见,而非绝对的、不容置疑的不变真理。新刑事诉讼法第48条将"鉴定结论"修改为"鉴定意见",反映出法律更加谨慎、理智地看待鉴定意见证据的证明力。Appraisal technologies are being frequently used in judicial practice. Due to its professionalism and seientificalness, appraisal opinions are seldom questioned in court. Appraisal opinions, however in fact, are expert opinions but not absolute truth, whose probative force should be considered objectively.

关 键 词：鉴定结论 鉴定意见 证明力 刑事诉讼法 

分 类 号：DF73[政治法律—诉讼法学]