检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张岩[1,2] 马丽娜[1,2] 王鹏[3,2] 陶遵威[2]
机构地区:[1]天津中医药大学,天津300073 [2]天津市医药科学研究所,天津300020 [3]天津医科大学,天津300070
出 处:《中国新药杂志》2012年第8期921-925,共5页Chinese Journal of New Drugs
基 金:天津市自然科学基金(10JCZDJC21000)
摘 要:目的:优选苦豆子多糖的除蛋白工艺,确定最佳的除蛋白质方法。方法:以多糖损失率和蛋白脱除率为评价指标,比较Sevage法、三氯乙酸法和酶法对苦豆子多糖的脱蛋白效果。结果:Sevage法、三氯乙酸法和酶法的蛋白脱除率分别为85.80%,72.47%,91.99%,多糖损失率分别为23.76%,9.86%,1.99%。酶法脱蛋白效果最佳,最佳脱蛋白工艺为:木瓜蛋白酶用量2.0%(v/v),pH值7.0,温度60℃,时间4 h。结论:酶法是苦豆子多糖脱除蛋白质的最佳方法,此法可以较好地脱除游离蛋白,并使多糖损失较少。Objective: To optimize the technological process removing proteins in the polysaccharide extracts from Sophora alopecuroides L.Methods: The effects of Sevage method,trichloroacetic acid method and enzyme method on deproteinization of Sophora alopecuroides L.polysaccharides were compared and evaluated in terms of the ratio of protein removal and polysaccharide loss.Results: The protein removal rates of Sevage method,trichloroacetic acid method and enzyme method were 85.80%,72.47% and 91.99%,and the polysaccharide loss rates were 23.76%,9.86% and 1.99%,respectively.Therefore the deproteinizing effect of enzyme method was the best,and the optimum technological conditions of deproteinization were the use of 2.0% papain(v/v),pH 7 at 60 ℃ for 4 h.Conclusion: The enzyme method is the best deproteinization method of the polysaccharide extracts from Sophora alopecuroides L.,with higher removal of dissociated proteins and lower loss of polysaccharides.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222