走出解释困境:对“不可道之道”的道说?  

Out of the Dilemma in Explanation——The Saying of "That Can't Be Said"

作　　者：唐少莲[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东石油化工学院思想政治理论教学部,广东茂名525000

出　　处：《广东石油化工学院学报》2012年第2期1-5,共5页Journal of Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology

基　　金：广东省哲学社会科学"十一五"规划青年项目(09-C08);广东省高校人文社会科学青年基金资助项目(02SJC720004)

摘　　要：长期以来,道家之"道"的真正意涵一直众说纷纭。"道"本身的模糊性和解释视角的多样化不仅带来理解的歧异,而且还引发意识形态的纠缠。其实,"道"作为道家形上之思的突出表征,乃在其为我们敞开了一个超越一切"有限"而又不离一切"有限"的"自然世界"。"道"物不二,天人本一,道家"道"的形上学不是一种本体论兴趣的形上学,而是一种生存论兴趣的形上学,一种实践论兴趣的形上学。For a long time,the ＂Tao＂ has been in different understandings.The ambiguity of ＂Tao＂ itself and the diversity of interpretation perspectives give rise to contradiction as well as a struggle of ideology.In fact,the outstanding characterization and unique identifier in the Taoist metaphysical thinking has opened a ＂free and natural world＂ to us,in which the ＂Tao＂ goes beyond all finite things but fails to separate from them.The ＂Tao＂ and everything,plus the heaven and people,are not two separate things but one.The metaphysics of ＂Tao＂ in Taoism is not an interest in metaphysical ontology,but an existential interest in metaphysics,a metaphysical theory of practice of interest.

关 键 词：“道” 形而上 超越 “道”物不二 

分 类 号：B223[哲学宗教—中国哲学]