检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐润拓[1,2]
机构地区:[1]山东大学文学与新闻传播学院,山东济南250100 [2]鲁东大学文学院,山东烟台264025
出 处:《廊坊师范学院学报(社会科学版)》2012年第2期18-21,共4页Journal of Langfang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:陈晓明提出的评价中国当代文学应有"中国立场"的说法细究起来是可疑的,强调中国历史和文学的独特性,不能抹煞了更大的、更具普遍性的世界视角和文学尺度。历史合理性并不等于文学合理性。当代汉语写作有其独特性,但不能因此而拒绝中国古代文学以及外国文学所已确立和达到的水准与高度,过分强调其不可比性和不可通约性实际上是一种心虚和逃避。"中国立场"的提法会将单纯的文学评价问题复杂化,带上不必要的政治及民族的情感色彩,评价当代中国文学,多些"文学立场",而少些混杂不清的"中国立场",显然将有益而无害。Chen Xiao-ming argues that China Standpoint is needed to evaluate modern Chinese literature. This statement may be doubtable when under careful investigation, in that when highlighting the distinctiveness of Chinese history and literature, we should not neglect the greater and more universal international perspective and literary standards. Historical reasonability does not mean literary reasonabihty. Modern Chinese writing has its unique characteristics; yet, the level and establishments of both the ancient Chinese literature and foreign literature cannot be denied. Excessive emphasis on incommensurability actually equals to less confidence or escape. The "China standpoint" proposition will cause complexity in the evaluation of literature, bringing in unnecessary political and national emotions. Therefore, it will be useful and harmless to evaluate the modern Chinese literature with a "literary standpoint" rather than the obscure "China standpoint."
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145