检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任镜清[1,2] 刘建伟[1,2] 刘少杰[1,2] 黄时杰[1,2] 陈志棠[1,2] 黄勇[1,2] 洪劲松[1,2]
机构地区:[1]暨南大学第四附属医院 [2]广州市红十字会医院普外科,广州510220
出 处:《中华普通外科学文献(电子版)》2012年第2期7-10,共4页Chinese Archives of General Surgery(Electronic Edition)
摘 要:目的比较腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术与开腹手术的近远期临床疗效。方法回顾性分析1998年1月至2008年12月在本院行结直肠癌根治性手术的375例患者的临床病理资料,根据其手术方式分为腹腔镜手术组(72例)和开腹手术组(303例),比较两组的一般资料、手术时间、出血量、淋巴结数目、肛门排气时间、术后住院时间、术后并发症及术后无瘤生存率。结果腹腔镜组和开腹手术组资料具有可比性,在出血量(121.81mlvs160.41ml)、肛门排气时间(3.03dvs3.90d)、术后住院时间(12.03dvs15.69d)腹腔镜组优于开腹手术组(P均<0.05),两组手术时间(209.79minvs198.50min)、淋巴结数目(10.82vs9.48)及术后并发症发生率(23.61%vs26.07%)差异无统计学意义,腹腔镜组术后3、5年无瘤生存率分别为67.7%、60.3%,开腹手术组分别为66.8%、53.5%,两组比较差异无统计学意义,按病理分期分层分析两组的术后无瘤生存率仍差异无统计学意义。结论腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术近期疗效优于开腹手术,远期疗效与开腹手术相当,腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术具有可行性。Objective To compare the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Methods The clinicopathologic factors and follow-up data of 375 cases with colorectal cancer after curative resection from January 1998 to December 2008 were analyzed retrospectively, the clinicopathologic factors, operation time, blood loss, number of removed lymph nodes, recovery of bowel function, hospital stay, morbidity and recurrence were compared between laparoscopic surgery group and open surgery group. Results There was no difference in clinicopathologic factors between the two groups, blood loss (121.81 ml vs. 160.41 ml), recovery of bowel function (3.03 d vs. 3.90 d), hospital stay (12.03 d vs. 15.69 d) were better in laparoscopic surgery group than in opens- urgery group. There was no difference in operation time (209.79 rain vs. 198.50 min), number of remo ved lymph nodes (10.82 vs. 9.48) and morbidity (23.61% vs. 26.07%) between the two groups. The 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival in laparoscopic surgery group were 7.7% and 60.3%, which were 66.8% and 53.5% in open surgery group, there was still no difference in disease-free survival when stratification for stage. Conclusion The short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery are better than these of open surgery for colorectal cancer, and long-term outcomes are comparable. Laparoseopic surgery can be used for radical resection of colorectal cancer.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.23.59.191