检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华北电力大学经济与管理学院,北京102206 [2]中国地质大学人文经管学院北京100083
出 处:《中国软科学》2012年第4期153-159,共7页China Soft Science
基 金:教育部博士点基金(20110036120013);北京市社科重点项目(11JGA010);北京市共建重点项目(GJ2011008)
摘 要:行政管理机制是实现政府减排目标的一种重要方式,本文研究行政管理减排机制对企业生产策略及收益的影响。在企业的产品需求为随机变量的条件下,分别建立了强制减排机制和税费机制下的企业生产优化模型。通过对比两种机制下企业的最优生产策略及其期望收益的变化,表明了税费机制是一种比强制机制更有利的、促进政府减排目标实现的方式,是一种能够实现政府与企业的"双赢"机制。Administrative scheme of carbon abatement is a very important approach to achieve government's carbon reduction goal.This paper focus on impacts of different administrative approaches on corporations' producing policy and their income.Based on the stochastic demand on their products,different optimization models are presented to decide corporations' optimal amount of products,which is to maximize their expected net income under different administrative abatement approaches.Two kinds of administrative abatement approaches,command-and-control,cap-and-penalty or cap-and-tax,are considered.By comparing the optimal amount of products and optimal expected net income in different abatement approaches,the result demonstrates that cap-and-tax or cap-and-penalty is more efficient than command-and-control in terms of expected net income.And they may lead to a "win-win" situation for both the government and corporations.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229