检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津师范大学心理与行为研究院,天津300074
出 处:《心理与行为研究》2012年第3期190-195,共6页Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基 金:天津市教育科学"十一五"规划重点课题(ZZG193)的资助
摘 要:采用乐观人格倾向问卷筛选乐观水平低组(96名)和高组(99名)大学生,探讨不同乐观水平大学生在生命救助、奖学金申请、娱乐金钱3种决策任务领域上的框架效应及其在性别、专业的特点。结果发现:(1)不同乐观水平大学生在不同决策任务领域上的框架效应特点不同,乐观水平低组和高组大学生在生命救助问题上表现为偏向于风险的单向框架效应,乐观水平高组大学生在娱乐金钱问题上倾向于风险寻求;(2)乐观水平高的男大学生在3种决策任务领域上均倾向于风险寻求,低乐观水平的女大学生在生命救助问题上表现为偏向于风险的单向框架效应;(3)奖学金申请问题上,高乐观水平的文科大学生倾向于风险寻求,低乐观水平的理科正面框架下倾向于风险规避。The study explored different optimistic level college students' framing -effects in three decision areas (life- save, scholarship-application entertainment-money) and their difference in gender and major. Subjects were divid- ed by optimism dispositional questionnaire into 96 low optimistic level group and 99 high optimistic level group. The results found: (1) the character of different optimistic level college students' framing-effects varied with the areas of decision,college students with low and high optimistic level both tended to be risk-seeking of unidirec- tional framing effects in life-save problem,college students with high optimistic level tended to be risk-seeking in entertainment-money problem; (2) male college students with high optimistic level tended to be risk-seeking in three decision areas, female college students with low optimistic level tended to be risk-seeking of unidirectional framing effects in life-save problem; (3) in scholarship-application problem, liberal arts college students with high optimistic level tended to be risk-seeking, science college students with low optimistic level tended to be risk-averse in positive frame.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7