文本田野中的墨家逻辑“名”范畴意义分析  

A Semantic Analysis of the Category of Ming in Mobian

作　　者：曾昭式[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学哲学系,广州510275

出　　处：《云南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2012年第3期68-72,共5页Journal of Yunnan Normal University：Humanities and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目("基于广义论证的先秦逻辑研究";批准号:10JJD720009)与教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划"项目阶段成果

摘　　要：《墨辩》逻辑是围绕"名"问题展开研究的,它是墨家论辩的基础。如果说《小取》是墨家逻辑总纲的话,那么《小取》的逻辑体系无不涉及"名实"关系,而《经上》、《经说上》、《经下》、《经说下》、《大取》则是对名实关系的全面论述。这种"名"不同于西方传统逻辑的"词项"(概念)理论。The logical studies in Mobian are centered on the issue of Ming, and have laid the ground- work for the Mohist theory of argumentation. If the chapter of Xiaoqu could be regarded as the out- line of the Mohist logic, then we could find within this chapter a detailed discussion of the relation be- tween Ming and Shi. And when taking together the chapters of J ingshang, J ingshuoshang, Jingx- ia, Jingshuoxia, and Daqu, a comprehensive theory of Ming and Shi is well established. However, it can be demonstrated that the category of Ming itself is essentially different from the category of ＂term＂ （concept） in traditional Western logic.

关 键 词：墨辩 西方传统逻辑 “名” 

分 类 号：B81-092[哲学宗教—逻辑学]