仙凡之隔:船山诗学视域中的二曹诗歌  

Different Works from the Ordinary Mortals and the Genius: Cao Pi and Cao Zhi's Poems in Poetics of Wang Fu-zhi

作　　者：秦秋咀[1] 

机构地区：[1]衡阳师范学院中文系,湖南衡阳421002

出　　处：《衡阳师范学院学报》2012年第2期1-6,共6页Journal of Hengyang Normal University

基　　金：湖南省哲学社会科学基金委托项目:<王夫之诗学体系研究>(2010JD41);衡阳师范学院科学基金项目:<王船山诗学性情观研究>(09B01)

摘　　要：关于曹丕、曹植二人诗歌高下的问题,自钟嵘《诗品》以来,论者大都认为曹植诗歌胜于曹丕。船山先生却认为二人诗歌有着"仙凡之隔",曹丕有着"独至之清",所以他的诗歌属于"仙"品,他本人则被推许为"诗圣";而曹植诗歌"建立门庭",因而属于"凡"品,其本人也被贬为"驵才"。船山先生立论的内在逻辑在于:首先,他以《诗三百》作为后世诗歌趋赴的理想,追求一种天然本真的诗歌境界;其次,他采取正反相形的方式评诗,其肯定性评述常有精微之论,但否定性评述有时则失于偏颇。二曹诗歌的个案体证了船山诗学的这种内在逻辑。On the question that whose poems were more outstanding between Cao Pi and Cao Zhi,most critics followed Zhong Rong,who thought Cao Zhi was.However,Wang Fu-zhi did not think so.Mr.Wang believed that theirs were different works from ordinary mortals and the genius,Cao Pi specially had a fresh talent,so his poems were works of the genius and he was a top poet;at the same time,Cao Zhi＇s poems were extraordinary works with clear routines,and he was the mediocrity.Of course,there was an inherent logic in Wang Fu-zhi＇s evaluation.At first,＂The Book of Songs＂ was regarded as the ideal model of later poems and pursued a natural realm of poetry;On the second,he criticized poetry through comparing the positive comments and the negative ones to each them,therefore,he affirmed that when a person was appropriate to discuss,but it seemed to be narrow when he denied another person sometimes.A case of Cao Pi and Cao Zhi＇s poems in point confirmed this.

关 键 词：仙凡之隔 船山诗学 曹丕 曹植 

分 类 号：B249.2[哲学宗教—中国哲学]