检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张海凤[1] 吕秀萍[1] 徐咏莲[1] 封硕[1] 刘华[1]
机构地区:[1]山东省潍坊医学院附属医院妇科,潍坊261000
出 处:《中国微创外科杂志》2012年第5期450-453,共4页Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery
摘 要:目的探讨RUNX3和Survivin在子宫内膜癌(endometrial carcinoma,EC)组织中的表达。方法采用免疫组化链霉菌抗生物素蛋白-过氧化物酶连结法(streptavidin-peroxidase,SP)检测20例正常增生期子宫内膜、20例非典型增生子宫内膜、60例EC组织中RUNX3和Survivin蛋白的表达,比较其差异。结果在EC中,RUNX3和Survivin蛋白的阳性表达率分别是25.0%(15/60)和91.7%(55/60),随着组织学分级升高及分期进展,RUNX3阳性表达率逐渐降低(χ2=16.275,P=0.000),而Survivin蛋白表达逐渐升高(χ2=6.251,P=0.044),两者阳性表达率均与肌层浸润深度、淋巴结转移及有无脉管浸润无关(P均>0.05)。Survivin蛋白在EC中的阳性表达率91.7%(55/60)明显高于正常增生期15.0%(3/20)和非典型增生子宫内膜65.0%(13/20)(χ2=44.221,P=0.000;χ2=8.848,P=0.000),其中正常增生期与非典型增生子宫内膜Survivin蛋白表达阳性率有统计学差异(χ2=8.640,P=0.003)。RUNX3蛋白在EC中的阳性表达率25.0%(15/60)明显低于正常增生期90.0%(18/20)和非典型增生子宫内膜60.0%(12/20)(χ2=26.151,P=0.000;χ2=8.218,P=0.004),正常增生期与非典型增生子宫内膜RUNX3蛋白阳性表达率无统计学差异(χ2=3.333,P=0.068)。结论 EC中RUNX3蛋白表达较低或缺失,Survivin蛋白表达较高。Objective To investigate the expression of RUNX3 and Survivin protein in endomctrial carcinoma (EC). Methods The expression of RUNX3 and Survivin protein in endometrial carcinoma( EC, n = 60) , atypical endometrial hyperplasia (n = 20) and normal endometrial tissues (n = 20) were examined by immunohistochemistry (SP method). Results In EC, the positive expression rates of RUNX3 and Survivin were 25.0% (15/60) and 91.7% (55/60) , respectively. With the histological grade increasing and FIGO stage progressing, the positive expression rate of RUNX3 decreased (χ^2=16. 275, P = 0. 000) , and that of Survivin increased (χ^2= 6. 251, P = 0. 044). The expression of RUNX3 and survivin were not related to the depth of muscular invasion, lymph node metastasis and lymphatic vessel invasion( all P 〉 0.05). The positive expression rate of Survivin protein in EC (91.7% ,55/60) was significantly higher than that in normal proliferative endometrium( 15.0%, 3/20) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia(65.0% ,13/20)(χ^2= 44. 221, P = 0. 000; χ^2= 8. 848, P = 0. 000), and between normal endometrium and atypical endometrial hyperplasia, the positive expression rate of Survivin protein was also significant different (χ^2= 8. 640, P = 0. 003 ). Whereas, the positive rate of RUNX3 in EC (25.0% , 15/60) was significantly lower than that in normal proliferative endometrium (90.0% , 18/20) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (60.0% , 12/20) (χ^2= 26. 151, P = 0. 000; χ^2= 8. 218, P = 0. 004 ), and between normal proliferative endometrium and atypical endometrial hyperplasia, the positive expression rate of RUNX3 protein was not significantly different(χ^2= 3. 333, P = 0. 068 ). Conclusion The expression of RUNX3 protein is lower or absent in EC, but the expression of Survivin protein is higher.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222